ECON 002 - Principles of Microeconomics
|
I. Multiple choice
(1)c. (2)d. (3)b. (4)c. (5)b. (6)b. (7)b. (8)e. (9)c. (10)a. (11)d. (12)b. (13)c. (14)a. (15)c. (16)c. (17)c. (18)c. (19)c. (20)b. (21)d. (22)a. (23)c. (24)d. (25)b. (26)b. (27)c. (28)c.
[Multiple-choice question (2) reads: "Aaron buys a ticket to a football game for $50. When he arrives at the stadium, he discovers that scalpers are willing to pay $150 for his ticket. His opportunity cost of attending the game is..."
To answer this question, imagine that Aaron initially has, say, $1000 in his bank account. He buys a ticket for $50, reducing his bank balance to $950. If he attends the game, his bank balance stays at $950. If he accepts the scalper's offer, his bank balance grows by $150 to $1100. So Aaron can either attend the game and have a bank balance of $950, OR skip the game and have a bank balance of $1100. So his opportunity cost of attending the game is the difference, $150.]
II. Problems
(1) [Percent change, midpoint formula: 2 pts] ΔP = $2 and midpoint P = $5, so percent change is $2/$5 = 40 percent.
(2) [Percent change of product: 4 pts]
(3) [Production functions: 8 pts]
(4) [Comparative advantage, gains from trade: 17 pts]
(5) [Shifts in demand and supply: 15 pts] Full credit requires accurate graphs.
(6) [Consumer surplus, producer surplus: 22 pts]
III. Critical thinking [4 pts]
YES, both countries can enjoy combination of goods outside their individual PP curves through specialization and trade. Here is an example. Country A produces 10 units of electronics and no cars. Country B produces 10 units of cars and no electronics. Country A then exports 5 units of electronics to Country B. In return, Country B exports 5 units of cars to Country A. Both countries then can consume 5 units of electronics and 5 units of cars, a combination that is clearly outside their individual PP curves. (Full credit requires that this trade be plotted on the graphs.)
[Paul Krugman won the Nobel prize in 2008 for developing the theory of international trade when countries have decreasing opportunity costs. He was motivated by rapid postwar expansion of international trade between similar countries--like France and Germany.]
I. Multiple choice
(1)e. (2)d. (3)d. (4)b. (5)d. (6)a. (7)b. (8)d. (9)a. (10)c. (11)a. (12)c. (13)a. (14)b. (15)d. (16)d. (17)a. (18)d. (19)d. (20)a. (21)d. (22)c. (23)d. (24)d. (25)a. (26)b. (27)b. (28)a.
[Multiple-choice question (2) reads: "Brian buys a ticket to a concert for $50. When he arrives at the venue, he discovers that scalpers are willing to pay $75 for his ticket. His opportunity cost of attending the concert is..."
To answer this question, imagine that Brian initially has, say, $1000 in his bank account. He buys a ticket for $50, reducing his bank balance to $950. If he attends the concert, his bank balance stays at $950. If he accepts the scalper's offer, his bank balance grows by $75 to $1025. So Brian can either attend the concert and have a bank balance of $950, OR skip the concert and have a bank balance of $1025. So his opportunity cost of attending the concert is the difference, $75.]
II. Problems
(1) [Percent change, midpoint formula: 2 pts] ΔP = $4 and midpoint P = $8, so percent change is $4/$8 = 50 percent.
(2) [Percent change of product: 4 pts]
(3) [Production functions: 8 pts]
(4) [Comparative advantage, gains from trade: 17 pts]
(5) [Shifts in demand and supply: 15 pts] Full credit requires accurate graphs.
(6) [Consumer surplus, producer surplus: 22 pts]
III. Critical thinking
Same as Version A.
[end of answer key]