ECON 120 - Regulation and Antitrust Policy
Drake University, Spring 2019
William M. Boal
|
|
EXAM 2 ANSWER KEY
Version A
I. Multiple choice
(1)a. (2)b. (3)b. (4)c. (5)a. (6)c. (7)a. (8)c. (9)a. (10)b.
(11)a. (12)b. (13)d. (14)a. (15)c.
II. Problems
(1) [Monopoly, markup formula, Lerner index: 4 pts]
- $16, using formula P = MC / (1 + (1/ε)).
- 1/4 = 0.25, using formula L = (P-MC)/P or for monopoly L = 1/|ε|.
(2) [Antitrust statutes: 4 pts] See Viscusi, Harrington, and Sappington textbook, appendix to chapter 3.
- Sherman Act Section 2.
- Federal Trade Commission Act.
- Clayton Act Section 7.
- Sherman Act Section 1.
(3) [Cournot duopoly: 14 pts]
- TRA = P qA
= 15 qA - (qA2/10)
- (qA qB/10).
- MRA = d TRA / d qA
= 15 - (2qA/10) - (qB/10).
- qA = 60 - (qB/2).
- qA* = 40.
- Q* = 80, P* = $7.
- L = (P-MC)/P = 4/7.
- Deadweight loss = $80. (Note that competitive supply curve is horizontal at $3, and intersects demand at Q=120.)
(4) [Joint profit maximization: 10 pts]
- MR = 15 - (2Q/10).
- Q* = 60.
- P* = $9.
- L = (P-MC)/P = 2/3.
- Deadweight loss = $180.
(5) [Price-setting (Bertrand) duopoly with differentiated products: 15 pts]
- TRA = 300 PA - 20 PA2
+ 10 PA PB.
- Set 0 = dTRA/dPA
= 300 - 40 PA + 10 PB,
and solve for PA to get
PA = (30 + PB) / 4.
- Substitute PA for PB
in the best reply function and solve to get
PA* = $10 = PB*.
- Subsitute $10 for PA and PB in
Firm A's demand function to get
QA* = 200 = QB*.
- TRA* = PA* × QA*
= $2000 = TRB*.
(6) [Measures of concentration: 6 pts]
- 59 percent.
- 88 percent.
- 1126.
(7) [Entry barriers and contestable markets: 26 pts]
- Min AC = $2.
- Min efficient scale = 8 million.
- L = (P-MC)/P = 3/5 = 0.6 .
- P = $3.
- AC = $4.
- Loss, because P < AC.
- $4 million.
- Q = 12 million.
- AC = $2.
- Profit, because entrant's P > AC.
- $24 million.
- $2, to prevent profitable entry.
- L = (P-MC)/P = 0, since P=AC=MC.
III. Critical thinking [4 pts]
(1) Collusion with differentiated products
- TR = TRA + TRB
= (300 PA - 20 PA2
+ 10 PA PB)
+ (300 PB - 20 PB2
+ 10 PA PB).
To maximize combined profit, set
0 = dTR/dPA = 300 - 40 PA + 20 PB, and
0 = dTR/dPB = 300 - 40 PB + 20 PA.
Assuming symmetry (PA = PB)
we can use just the first equation and substitute to get
0 = 300 - 40 PA + 20 PA.
Solve to get PA* = $15 = PB*.
- Substitute these prices into either demand equation to get
QA* = 150 = QB*.
- TR* = TRA* + TRB*
= (PA* × QA*) + (PB* × QB*).
= $4500, which is higher than combined revenue in problem (5).
(2) Credible threat
- A credible threat is action that a player will actually have an incentive to carry out when provoked.
- In the scenario of the question, Firm A threatens to lower its price below its average cost if Firm B enters the market. Since firm A would thereby make losses, its threat is not credible.
Version B
I. Multiple choice
(1)c. (2)a. (3)e. (4)a. (5)c. (6)d. (7)b. (8)b. (9)c. (10)c.
(11)b. (12)a. (13)c. (14)b. (15)d.
II. Problems
(1) [Monopoly, markup formula, Lerner index: 4 pts]
- $10, using formula P = MC / (1 + (1/ε)).
- 1/5 = 0.2, using formula L = (P-MC)/P or for monopoly L = 1/|ε|.
(2) [Antitrust statutes: 4 pts] See Viscusi, Harrington, and Sappington textbook, appendix to chapter 3.
- Clayton Act Section 7.
- Sherman Act Section 1.
- Sherman Act Section 2.
- Federal Trade Commission Act.
(3) [Cournot duopoly: 14 pts]
- TRA = PA
= 10 qA - (qA2/100)
- (qA qB/100).
- MRA = d TRA / d qA
= 10 - (2qA/100) - (qB/100).
- qA = 300 - (qB/2).
- qA* = 200.
- Q* = 400, P* = $6.
- L = (P-MC)/P = 1/3.
- Deadweight loss = $200. (Note that competitive supply curve is horizontal at $4, and intersects demand at Q=600.)
(4) [Joint profit maximization: 10 pts]
- MR = 10 - (2Q/100).
- Q* = 300.
- P* = $7.
- L = (P-MC)/P = 3/7.
- Deadweight loss = $450.
(5) [Price-setting (Bertrand) duopoly with differentiated products: 15 pts]
- TRA = 200 PA - 30 PA2
+ 10 PA PB.
- Set 0 = dTRA/dPA
= 200 - 60 PA + 10 PB,
and solve for PA to get
PA = (20 + PB) / 6.
- Substitute PA for PB
in the best reply function and solve to get
PA* = $4 = PB*.
- Subsitute $4 for PA and PB in
Firm A's demand function to get
QA* = 120 = QB*.
- TRA* = PA* × QA*
= $480 = TRB*.
(6) [Measures of concentration: 6 pts]
- 31 percent.
- 51 percent.
- 404.
(7) [Entry barriers and contestable markets: 26 pts]
- Min AC = $4.
- Min efficient scale = 5 million.
- L = (P-MC)/P = 1/3 .
- P = $4.
- AC = $5.
- Loss, because P < AC.
- $4 million.
- Q = 10 million.
- AC = $4.
- Profit, because entrant's P > AC.
- $10 million.
- $4, to prevent profitable entry.
- L = (P-MC)/P = 0, since P=AC=MC.
III. Critical thinking [4 pts]
(1) Collusion with differentiated products
- TR = TRA + TRB
= (200 P qA - 30 PA2
+ 10 PA PB)
+ (200 P qB - 30 PB2
+ 10 PA PB).
To maximize combined profit, set
0 = dTR/dPA = 200 - 60 PA + 20 PB, and
0 = dTR/dPB = 200 - 60 PB + 20 PA.
Assuming symmetry (PA = PB)
we can use just the first equation and substitute to get
0 = 200 - 30 PA + 20 PA.
Solve to get PA* = $5 = PB*.
- Substitute these prices into either demand equation to get
QA* = 100 = QB*.
- TR* = TRA* + TRB*
= (PA* × QA*) + (PB* × QB*).
= $1000, which is higher than combined revenue in problem (5).
(2) Credible threat--same as Version A.
[end of answer key]