Regulation and Antitrust Policy (Econ 180)
|
Course page:
www.drake.edu/cbpa/econ/boal/180
|
I. Multiple choice [3 pts each: 18 pts total]
(1)c. (2)b. (3)a. (4)b. (5)c. (6)a.
II. Problems
(1) [Franchise bidding versus ROR regulation: 20 pts]
(2) [Second-price sealed-bid auctions: 18 pts]
(3) [Franchise bidding: 16 pts]
(4) [Effect of franchise fee: 18 pts]
III. Challenge question [10 pts]
With one company, the market outcome is given as monopoly so the quantity is 4 thousand and the price is $40. With two companies, the market outcome is given as price competition, so the quantity is 6 thousand and the price is $30 (marginal cost). Deadweight loss from monopoly pricing is $10 thousand, but the cost saving from production by only one company is $40 thousand. Because the cost saving exceeds the deadweight loss from monopoly pricing, one company is better for society than two companies.
I. Multiple choice [3 pts each: 18 pts total]
(1)d. (2)a. (3)c. (4)c. (5)d. (6)b.
II. Problems
(1) [Franchise bidding versus ROR regulation: 20 pts]
(2) [Second-price sealed-bid auctions: 18 pts]
(3) [Franchise bidding: 16 pts]
(4) [Effect of franchise fee: 18 pts]
III. Challenge question [10 pts]
With one company, the market outcome is given as monopoly so the quantity is 4 thousand and the price is $40. With two companies, the market outcome is given as price competition, so the quantity is 7 thousand and the price is $25 (marginal cost). Deadweight loss from monopoly pricing is $22.5 thousand, and the cost saving from production by only one company is $20 thousand. Because the cost saving is less than the deadweight loss from monopoly pricing, two companies are better for society than one company.
[end of answer key]